Ambiguously Disgruntled Manifesto

wasting your time since 1975

9/20/2002

I suppose I should post my picks for the weekend:
NFL:
Atlanta over Cincy
NY Giants over SeeHacks
Miami over NY Jets
New Orleans over Chicago
St. Louis over Tampa Bay

PAC-10:
Cal over Air Force
USC over Kansas State
UCLA over Colorado
Oregon St over Fresno St
Wisconsin over Arizona

and now its back to normal

okay, I hated the new look... it was terrible, to say the least.. so I have promptly switched back to the old one, but have lost my customizations...

I have been posting regularly to my blog, but ther have not been getting published all week because of an error that has been occuring in Blogger. I had just continued to naively post, believing that it would somehow fix itself and all my posts would be published. Of course, that hasn't happened, and today I finally decided I needed to do something about it. After searching through the Blogger.com help section, I realized the only think I could do was to change the "template" (the appearance of the page). So, I have done that, and now my page looks different, but I will probably be changing ot back shortly. At least you can read what I have been writing all week.

9/17/2002

every sports fan, near-sports fan, or anyone who has ever watched/and/or/followed sports NEEDS to know about the Ewing Theory (thanks to the Sports Guy!)

Here are the "Pick 'Em" games for next weekend:
NFL:
Sunday night: Cincinatti @ Atlanta
Monday night: St. Louis @ Tampa Bay
Seattle @ NY Giants
New Orleans @ Chicago
NY Jets @ Miami
PAC-10:
Fesno State @ Oregon State
USC @ Kansas State
Colorado @ UCLA
Arizona @ Wisconsin
Air Force @ Cal

PAC-10 contest os "just for grins" until the PAC-10 inter-conference games start on the 28th (Sept) and 5th (Oct). At that point it will be similar to the NFL contest...

I'm going to start keeping "season totals" in the NFL contest on week 4 (that's Sunday the 29th). The season (that is week 4 through 17) high point winner will win something (details forthcoming) and each weekly "most points" winner will be entered in the drawing to win something (details forthcoming) -- each week you win means you get a "ticket" in the "raffle."

Don't be LAME! Just enter your picks! If you read this and don't send in your picks, you suck!

if you have no idea how this works, read here

"Pick 'Em" results from last weekend:
Jake (that's me!)
NFL: 9 pts.
PAC-10: 17 pts.

Tyler
NFL: 22 pts.
PAC-10: 11 pts.

Tad
NFL: 16 pts.
PAC-10: 13 pts.

Huaaah's to TYLER and ME for getting the high scores on NFL and PAC-10, respectively. Actually, more Huzzah's to Tyler, as the PAC-10 thing really doesn't mean anything until PAC-10 teams starts playing each other. So, Tyler is the big winner! Yipee! He wins a... 6-pack of my new Falling Leaf Autumnal Ale. Ya see, you DO get something for playing this silly little game!

9/16/2002

Well, here�s my take after 2 weeks of the NFL season:
Category A: The �Good� 2-0 teams

New England Patriots:
These guys are like the �01 Mariners (pretending that the M�s had won an improbable World Series in �00), they just do it with incredible defense, generally opportunistic play, great �in-game� coaching, a dearth of superstars (although people have attempted, wrongly, to put Tom Brady in this role), and a slew of solid offensive contributors who seem to take turns stepping to the forefront. Another lesson in Sports Chemistry.

Denver Broncos:
Okay they just beat the 49ers and Rams� holding both the offenses in check� and QB Brian Griese is supposedly mediocre at best and Still on the Hot Seat�?

New Orleans Saints:
They were clearly the better team against the Packers. This is a dynamic team that can score a lot of points.

Miami Dolphins:
They have a �big play� defense that creates a lot of turnovers. They have a very productive Ricky Williams. Jay Fielder is apparently pretty good. I wondered how in the hell they won 11 games last year, this year it will be no mystery.

Oakland Raiders:
A great start, but all they�ve beat is a fatally flawed Seahawks team and a Pittsburgh team that can�t seem to get its act together.

Chicago Bears:
It looks like this is one of those teams that just seems to get lucky all year long.


Category B: The �Bad� 2-0 teams:

Carolina and San Diego:
Let�s see, a combined 4-0 against the Texans, Bengals, Ravens, and Lions. Those are unquestionably the 4 worst teams in the NFL.

Category C: The �Good� 0-2 Teams:

Sub-category 1) AKA the Atlanta Falcons. Has there ever been a better 0-2 team? They lose, in OT, AT Green Bay, then they lose to the Bears on a missed field goal. Ouch!

Sub-category 2) AKA the fatally flawed �Super Bowl Contenders� St. Louis Rams and Pittsburgh Steelers. These guys won�t be considered �good� too much longer if they keep this crap up. The Steelers have Kordell at QB and a pass defense that has been exposed. The Rams� well, they play sloppy, make stupid mistakes, and are getting horrible coaching (for a good take on that, read this)

Category D: The 0-2 teams you would expect to be and/or get better:

Seattle Seahawks and Minnesota Vikings: The �Hawks are going nowhere without Some ability to run and stop the run (but more on the �Hawks later), the Vikings need to get that potentially great offense on track and play at least Some defense. We�ll just have to see what happens.

Category E: Do they even have a prayer?

The aforementioned Texans, Bungles, Ravens, and Lions. These guys all aspire to make it to 4 wins.

Category F: Divisional Malaise

Part 1: the AFC South
Indy Colts, Tennessee Titans, Jacksonville Jaguars (Houston Texans are also here, but they�ve already been categorized). If I could put money on it, I would lay bets that the winners of this division (and AFC North) will have no better than a 9-7 record. In fact, I look at the AFC South and see three 9-7 teams, with the Texans at 3-13. The only team out of the bunch (including the North) I can see winning more at this point is the Colts, who have a lot of upside with the Manning/James/Harrison trifecta and a theoretically improved defense.

Part 2: the NFC East:
Washington Redskins, NY Giants, Dallas Cowboys, Philly Eagles:
We�ll have to see what happens in the Eagles-Redskins game tonight, but I don�t see a real power here. The Redskins should be exciting, but I see 8 wins. I don�t think the Eagles are as good as a year ago, and Dallas has a great defense, but a Quincy Carter-led offense will take them nowhere this year. The Giants may actually be pretty good, but more likely Kerry Collins will come back to earth and they will be largely uninspiring again.

Category G: Defining mediocrity

My central NFL theory is that about 24 of the 32 teams are solidly mediocre, as defined by being 7-9, 8-8, or 9-7. A few of those teams win or lose won or more games they �shouldn�t have� to climb to 10-6 or 11-5, or dip to 6-10 or 5-11. In other words, there are �bad� 6-10 or 5-11 teams or �good� 10-6 teams or 11-5 teams, and there are �mediocre� teams with those same records. In a true testament to NFL parity, one of those �mediocre� 11-5 teams won the Super Bowl last year (that would be the New England Patriots). So, as usual, most teams are 1-1 after two weeks. These guys could be okay, they could be bad, but it seems to me they are just �mediocre�:

Cleveland Browns: �should� be 2-0 (with that flukey loss to the Chiefs last week), but then all they�ve beat is the Bungles. They also have a couple of real cupcakes in the division, which should help their win total.

NY Jets: this is a hard team to figure. They strike me as an example of �mediocre� teams posting good records and making the playoffs the last two years.

Buffalo Bills: Like the Pats of a few years ago, will go as far as Bledsoe�s arm carries them. I hope Patriots fans got a chance to see the 4th quarter/OT of the Vikings game yesterday, when he willed to team to victory.

Kansas City Chiefs: so� do they have a great offense, or not?

Tampa Bay: are they Ever going to have a productive offense?

San Francisco: For whatever reason, I just don�t see them as being as good as a year ago.

Arizona: For whatever reason, I think they can manage their division and have a 7-9 year.

Green Bay: Of all the teams in this category, they have the best shot at being �good,� but they are also one Michael Vick play away from being 0-2. I�m not sure what to make of these guys, but as long as Favre�s in town, they are contenders.


The Seahawks: Boy, did Trent Dilfer look good running that offense. It almost made you forget that the Seahawks are destined to win no more than 5 games this year without drastic improvements.

While it�s easy to point at squandered red-zone opportunities (they should have scored at Least 13 more points yesterday) and the kickoff return TD they gave up � and these are certainly factors in this loss � it begins and ends with the running game. Simply, the Hacks can�t run, and they can�t stop the run. Through two games, here are the numbers: Seahawks 45 attempts for a 2.8 yard avg. Opponents 75 attempts for a 6.3 yard avg.





they say pictures are worth a thousand words... so to "tell" you all about our day trip to Vegas on Saturday, check out my Las Vegas Picture Files